All texts that came to our mind spontaneously

Fear and its consequences

Bulle

Imagine the situation that you are on a hike through fields and meadows and now just take the shortcut across a larger pasture.
You have successfully overcome the fence and are just in the middle of the pasture as Hugo, this magnificent bull and pride of the farmer,
spies you and finds your red shirt very remarkable. Why this color makes Hugo angry and move towards you, we don't know.
We can only imagine that you are not inclined to philosophize about it at that moment. Also your consideration to calculate the distance to the star Betageuze with the help of the Lord Pythagoras is abruptly interrupted.

Seriously, in such a situation the body stops everything that is not directly necessary for survival. That is the digestion, that is unimportant at the moment,
that is the immune system, that can take care of itself later, and even thinking stops.

Because thinking is counterproductive in this situation, if you think, you are too slow. There are automatic programs running,
that help you to go full throttle and reach the end of the pasture before Hugo.

Why am I telling you this? We are in a scary situation right now. The enemy is much smaller, not a bull, but a virus,
which allegedly wants to kill you.

Why allegedly?

It is not only that many renowned doctors and scientists report that this virus is less dangerous than the flu that occurs every year,
but they can tell you a lot of things.

After all, almost all the news says just the opposite, a danger of gigantic proportions is threatening us right now.

And although the media bring out one terrible news item after another, let's pause for a moment and look for the facts.
I had already done this for another text on this homepage and used official figures from both the UN, who keep real-time statistics,
as well as the Federal Statistical Office.

The result is that we currently have fewer deaths than the statistics would suggest.
And this applies to all the countries I checked, such as Germany, Italy, China, the USA and others.

For Germany, you can also compare it with the data from the Federal Statistical Office database.

And once the fear is over, you can also think again and ask yourself what this is really about.

We should always be aware that we shape our reality with our thinking.

And always ask ourselves if we want to think what we are told to think or what serves us.

And in this current case, think about whether the measures might make sense for other reasons.

In addition to fear, it is always emotional consternation that we are confronted with and that should guide our thoughts.
After all, emotional consternation and compassion is what makes us human.

But as I pointed out in another post, psychopaths don't know this feeling and that's where the problem arises.

Because most people can't imagine how icily psychopaths act to their advantage, showing neither remorse nor compassion.

And this is exactly the reason why many manipulations take place so subtly and effectively.

Think about it.

 bannere

Is "The Secret" still secret, and is that perhaps by design?
Geheimnis
 

Well, that's a stupid question, I'm sure many people are thinking. How can a book that has sold millions of copies and been translated into many languages still be secret? Where did I get such an idea?
Well, I've just had a lively discussion about it, and I'm really wondering now if the idea is so far-fetched.

In the beginning of "The Secret" it is reported that the secret of successful thinking has been kept secret by a few over the centuries, with the goal of being able to lead and exploit people better. Yes, I think you can leave that as a fact.

But at the latest with this book and the film this should be completely different, everyone should know about it and be able to apply it. Also well, everyone has the possibility to apply it, and nevertheless there are many groups in the net and elsewhere, which deal exactly with it. The reason is simple, because it does not work as expected.
Specifically, almost everyone wishes to be a millionaire, to have the ideal partnership and to be absolutely healthy.
And does it work? No, the people who have achieved all this effortlessly are really in the minority. So the statement from "The Secret", that we only have to think right,
is not true, it's just window dressing, a nice thought.
 
Now I scream very loudly: "Stop!!!!", it is all right what is said there, there are useful exercises, but .... . And this is what comes now.
But it lacks a deeper understanding of the Law of Attraction, we are not just the little something with a thinking consciousness. We also have a quite powerful subconscious mind, which accounts for far more than 90% of our thinking. Ok, then just turn that off, don't give it any power. Doesn't really work either, because if I take the power away from the engine of my car, it gets quieter, but it doesn't run anymore either.
 
I don't want to go into all the basics behind it, I've already done that enough elsewhere.
Back to the initial thesis, the secret is out, or is it?
 
If I assume that there is a leading group in the background, which knows and knew the secret, and which are anxious to keep it further secret,
why do they let it happen? That such a book and many other books about it appear, which do not go into the background in wide areas?
 
Quite simply, we live in a time, in which humans become increasingly more conscious, everyone gets that. You can't keep the thought completely secret anymore.
So, let's feed people with superficiality, they don't achieve the desired results and then declare for themselves that it probably doesn't work after all.
And thus the goal is reached again.
 
And everyone who thinks that there is no controlling intervention should think about the movie "The Matrix", for example. The first part wraps the whole thing in a nice story, but is actually quite close to the truth, Neo is the chosen one, who can change the matrix according to his wishes. Interestingly, always for the good of all. In the second and third part this is quickly taken back, he is not that omnipotent.
There is a happy end, but not as it was started in the first part.

Could it be that the powers-that-be noticed the explosiveness after the first part, and then had it defused in the second and third parts? so that no one notices what's really behind it?

And so we continue to be inundated with many books and films that are well written and contain many truths, but only scratch the surface.

Interesting thought, I think.

 

bannere

 

I AM A WIKASA WAKAN 

Indianer

 

"I AM A MEDICAL MAN" – a wicasa wakan. Medical man this is a word that the whites invented. I wish there was a better word to say,
what "medicine man" means to us, but I can't find one and you don't, so we have to settle for it. A wicasa wakan must be with itself a lot and often.
He wants to get away from the crowd, away from the small, everyday things.

He loves to meditate, to lean against a tree or a rock and to feel how the earth moves beneath him, and how above him the weight of the wide
flaming sky. In this way, he learns to understand. He closes his eyes, and he begins to see more clearly. What you see with your eyes closed counts.
The wicasa wakan loves silence, he wraps himself in it, as if in a blanket – a silence that does not remain silent, which teaches him many things with her thunderous voice.
Such a man loves to to be in a place where he hears only the buzz of insects. He sits, face to face, and asks for help. He talks to the plants, and they answer him.
He listens to the voices of the wama kaskan – the animals. He becomes one of them. Something of all living beings flows into it, and something also flows out of him. I do not know
what and how, but it is so. I've experienced it. A medical man must belong to the earth, must be able to read nature like a white man a book.

EVERYTHING, WHAT YOU EAT, is packed in a plastic case, is cleanly cut and prepared for the pan, has no taste, and does not arouse feelings of guilt in you.
When you wear your fur or leather coats, you don't want to be reminded of how much blood and pain they have cost. If we killed a buffalo, we knew
what we did. We asked His Spirit for forgiveness, and we told him why we had to do it. We honored with a prayer the bones of those who gave us their flesh as food
we prayed that they would come back, we prayed for the lives of our brothers, the buffalo people, as well as for our own people. For us, all life is sacred.
The state of Dakota has its own pest control officials. They sit on a plane and shoot the coyotes from the air. They keep a book about
each dead coyote is entered in its notebook. The cattle and sheep farmers pay them for it. Coyotes feed on rodents, field mice and other small
Animals. Occasionally they eat a sheep that has lost its way. They are the natural waste reverbetors, they clean the land of everything that is rotten and stinks.
Whoever takes the trouble and tames them, for them they are good playmates. But if they stay alive, some people are afraid to lose a few cents – and therefore
kill them from the plane. The coyotes were in this land before the sheep came here, but they are in your way, for you cannot profit from them.
More and more animals are dying out. The animals that the Great Spirit has put into this land must continue. Only the pets, only the animals bred by humans, are allowed
at least until they are driven to the slaughterhouse. This horrible arrogance of the white man, who presumes to be more than God, more than nature!
The white man says, "I let this beast live, because it brings me money"; and he says, "That beast must die, I cannot earn anything from it, the place it needs,
I can use better. Only a dead coyote is a good coyote". The whites treat the coyotes almost as badly as they once treated us First Nations.

I HAVE THE IMPRESSION that white people are so afraid of the world they have created themselves that they no longer see, feel, smell or smell it
want to hear. To feel rain and snow on your face, to be frozen by an icy wind and to thaw again by a smoking fire, from a
to come and dive into a cold river – these experiences show you that you are alive. But you don't want to feel that anymore. You live in boxes,
lock out the summer heat and winter cold, you live in a body that has lost its smell, you hear the noise from the Hi-Fi system instead of listening to the sounds of nature,
you watch the actors on TV who are giving you experiences, you who have long since forgotten to experience something for yourself. You eat food that is
taste nothing. That's your way. He's not good.

BEFORE OUR WHITE BROTHERS CAME to make civilized people out of us, we had no prisons. That is why we did not have any criminals.
Without a prison, there can be no criminals. We didn't have locks or keys, so we didn't have any thieves. If someone was so poor that he
no horse, no tent or blanket, so he was given all this.

We were far too uncivilized to place great value on personal possessions. We were only aiming for possession swayed to pass it on. We didn't know any money, and therefore
the value of a person is not measured according to his wealth. We had no written laws, no lawyers and politicians, so we were able to
do not deceive each other. It was really bad for us before the whites came, and I can't explain how we can get along without the basicthings.
which, as we are told, are so necessary for a civilised society.

MAN, TOO, IS MADE UP OF MANY THINGS. Whatever the air, the earth, the herbs, the stones, all this is also part of our bodies. We must learn again,
to be ourselves, and to feel and discover the diversity within us. Wakan Tanka, the Great Secret, teaches animals and plants what to do.

In nature, nothing is the same. How different are the birds! Some build nests, others don't. Some animals live in holes in the ground, others in caves, others in
in bushes. Still others can do without housing at all. Even animals of the same species – two deer, two owls – behave differently.

I have looked at many plants carefully. Of the leaves of one plant, all of which grow on the same stem, none is quite like the other. All over the world, there are
there are no two leaves that are completely identical to each other. The Great Spirit wanted it that way. For all creatures on earth, he has drawn the path of life only in great size;
it shows them the direction and the destination, but lets them find their own way there. He wants them to act independently, obeying their nature and their inner forces. If Wakan Tanka wants plants, animals, even small mice and beetles to live in this way – how much more will humans, who all do the same thing, live for him.
be an abomination: people who get up at the same time, put on the same clothes bought in the department store, and use the same subway that sits in the same office,
do the same work, stare at the same clock, and, worst of all, their thoughts are similar to each other. All creatures live on
a goal. Even an ant knows this goal – not with the mind, but somehow she knows it. Only people have come so far that they no longer know
why they live. They no longer use their minds, and they have long forgotten what a secret message their body has, what their senses and dreams tell them.
They do not use the knowledge that the Great Spirit has given to each of us, they are not even aware of it, and so they stumble blindly on the street,
which leads to nowhere – on a well-paved highway, which they themselves expand, straight and straight, so that they can get to the big empty hole all the faster,
that they expect in the end to devour them."

Lame Deer , (1890-1974), was a medical man of the Dakotas, a sub-tribe of the Sioux Indians).

bannere

Masterkey System and Mind Clearing

I once had the interesting question how Mind Clearing is compatible with the Masterkey System of Charles Haanel, where the differences are and where the similarities are.
and where there are similarities.

Let me put it this way, Mind Clearing is the logical implementation of the Masterkey System. The basis of everything are the 7 Hermetic Principles,
which were written down ages ago and which can be found everywhere, in direct or indirect form.

In both cases it is about the fact that we create our reality by our thinking in the first place.
And with it also our unpleasant life circumstances including all illnesses.

Charles Haanel had written the FMD in 1912 as a course of instruction and he gave his students a new lesson every week,
to learn right thinking. His point here was to replace non-serving thinking with serving thinking, to deprive non-serving thinking of nourishment,
so that it withers and plant new seeds. His exercises are about mind control and visualization.

It is about imprinting new thought patterns on the unconscious mind.

Mind Clearing follows the same path, only it incorporates the knowledge of the unconscious and methods that have increased in a good 100 years,
and methods of clearing it. Instead of just installing new beliefs, Mind Clearing first removes the old thought garbage,
to make room for the new thoughts.

As we know, in reality we don't get what we want or what someone else thinks we want, no, we get exactly what we already are mentally.
And in Mind Clearing we look at exactly what is there in our reality, what of our mostly unconscious thinking we let work outward.
And this is exactly what we change point by point.

In both cases, in FMD as well as in Mind Clearing, we assume that no two things can exist in the same place at the same time.
And in my opinion it is more effective to first throw out what we don't want and only then install something new,
because then there is space and it can be filled sensibly.

bannere

 

The free will of human

MarionetteMan

It is always a subject that we think about, and the opinions that arise here are very different. The question is, to what extent do we have free will? Well, as long as we live unconsciously, we certainly do not have free will. We have a vast amount of beliefs and knowledge stored in our unconscious mind and when a decision has to be made, we access this pool. Whether this information, which we find there, is correct and important for us, we question it then, if we begin to think consciously about it.

Otherwise it behaves exactly the same as with the posthypnotic commands, which cause someone to perform specific actions without them deciding it themselves. We get into a situation and it's always the same triggers that bring out the exact reaction we've always had. For example, if someone says something that I take as criticism, the first thing I will do is go after them and defend myself. A conscious person would first say to themselves, "Interesting, what does this affect me, what is there to this information. And what is the intention behind it?". And then the situation is questioned, the background is clarified and from this analysis new insights, new knowledge automatically arise.

The task here is to first play the observer, to step out of the situation. What does this have to do with me? Let's say someone criticizes my piano playing. Well, I don't know how to play the piano, I have no interest in it and there is no motivation for me to ever learn it. What would this criticism address me then? Right, not at all, I would dismiss it as irrelevant chatter and go on my way. Then along comes someone who criticizes me for not having the latest smartphone. What does he want? He probably wants to sell me a newer model, which is certainly more capable than the one I have now. But I stupidly decided that exactly the model I have now meets my requirements. Well, and already this criticism will not reach me either.

By the way, the laws of manipulation work according to exactly these rules. Do you need proof?

I attach a text, which I had written quite a long time ago during my studies of business administration, in order to clarify the methods of the advertisement.

Manipulation

Scientific definition:

Manipulation is a technique of domination working with psychological methods in the sense of a systematic, purposeful steering and shaping of the consciousness, the habits of thought, the emotions, the social, political and aesthetic interests of larger groups of the population. Manipulation leads to mental paternalism, uniformity and, under certain circumstances, to the systematic destruction of the personality or personal autonomy of those affected (external control).

(from: Dictionary of Sociology, Günter Hartfiel, 1972)

Manipulation in daily life!

Thesis: Manipulation is a game which takes place between people consciously or unconsciously every day. Whoever masters the rules of the game has a big advantage over the ignorant fellow players.

8 Laws of Manipulation:

First Law of Manipulation:

Recognize the opponents in the manipulative game.

These are:

1. the opposite sex
The one who loves another wants to win him over. He will consciously or unconsciously do everything to show the other that he is the ideal partner.

2. all those who stand in the way of our advancement.
It is not enough to be good. At least as important as skill, knowledge, diligence and good will is the ability to get people to recognize us and our achievements and to reward them to our advantage.

3. authority and anyone who takes advantage of that authority.
E.g.: Parents, superiors, strongmen, The state and its representatives, professionals of all kinds, the majority and title holders.
All these people have a great advantage because of their supposed professional knowledge. Often they entrench themselves behind their authority without bringing real arguments.

4. the society we live in
Society instills in us a role model, a behavioral stereotype that it has established as universally valid and correct.
It promises us rewards for behaving according to its stereotype. It promises us that others will admire us if we behave in conformity.
Those who behave according to the stereotype thereby serve as role models for everyone else.

5. the media
Reminder of the basic rules of advertising:
  - Attract the attention of the potential buyer.
  - Show advantages that the product brings him.
  - Prove exactly this advantage.
  - Arouse the need to perceive this advantage.
  - Call to action.
At no point is it asked whether the buyer really needs the product, the advertiser only asks how he can make the product so palatable to the buyer that he finally buys.
The media are just as important as opinion leaders. Through targeted sorting of information and appropriate presentation, opinions are generated among the masses that the powerful want to have there.

6. the family
When living closely together in a small group, each of the group members tries to impose his ideas and set his boundaries as far as possible.

Second Manipulation Law:

The decisive step from waiting to acting:

If you always just wait, you will not be able to use your chances. Often only the self-confidence is missing that one also has a chance (e.g. application for a particularly interesting job).

The important thing here is to stand out from the crowd and be noticed. One is then no longer one among many.

Effective methods to attract attention:

1. do the opposite of what others expect of you.
Normal reactions in this sense include:
  - Counterattack to attack
  - Defense to accusation
  - Criticism in response to the misconduct of others
  - Reverence and respect in the presence of higher-ups.
  - Dejection after a defeat

2. the purposeful flattery.
Examples:
"You look good today"
"I admire their knowledge of ..."
"Yes, when you have as much responsibility as they do ..."
"Someone in your position, of course, must also consider that ..."
Almost all people feel flattered, even if the statements are, in our opinion, crude and simplistic.

3. the purposeful provocation
The targeted provocation requires taking a certain risk. Whether one can use it as a means to achieve one's goals depends, among other things, on:
- the person of the opponent
- the current situation
- one's own position
Example: If the partner regularly threatens to separate, then it may be that this is just a common transaction to achieve his goals. If one is quite sure that it is a method, then one should help packing.

4. the superior knowledge
If one wants to convince his opponent of something, it is an urgent prerequisite that one has sound knowledge of the issue and can also point out relevant facts.
It is equally important to know something about the person of the opponent, e.g. hobbies, family, etc. If valid arguments have been made in the technical discussion, one finds oneself in a conflict situation because the opponent has a different opinion. If you redirect the conversation to a private and non-conflicting topic at the right moment, you gain sympathy. The actual decision falls then usually fast to the end of the discussion besides, naturally to the own satisfaction.

5 The detour method
The detour method consists of not giving the desired information directly to the opponent, but informing him through other sources (friends, acquaintances, media) before turning directly to him with his goal. The opponent is then already prepared accordingly.

6. the standing man method
"An attempt counts for nothing, only the result counts".
The use of the previously indicated methods can also give us failures. It is then important not to resign, but to start the next attempt as soon as possible. It is not the number of approaches that counts, but in the end it is only the result of the efforts that counts.

Third law of manipulation:

The packaging is not the same as the content

Most people fall for clever packaging time and again.
These include:

1. the belief in a doctor and in his ability to cure diseases just because he is a doctor

2. the expectation of justice just because someone is a judge.

3. the expectation that politicians, as the people's representatives, will act only for our good.

The wisdom: "Clothes make the man" fits exactly to this law, with the extension: Not only clothes, also labels.

So if you want to sell something, you have to package it (or yourself) accordingly.

Fourth law of manipulation:

What happens when a person hears the same message over and over again - instead of just once.

An assertion gains credibility to an increasing degree the more consistently and credibly it is repeated.

Whoever spreads an assertion with the indication that it already has credibility with other people, awakens the need to join the majority. It is thereby irrelevant, which truth content the indicated reference actually possesses.

With the number of assertions of an assertion the readiness grows with the receiver of this message to accept it also.

Variants of manipulative repetition:

1. stereotypical repetition
One and the same message is repeated again and again, sometimes in different packaging.

2. quantitative repetition
The indication that everyone says it is right or that most people are in favor of it causes quantitative repetition.

3. qualitative reinforcement
A message is qualitatively reinforced when people in authority (scientists, researchers, etc.) express this opinion.
Likewise, it is reinforced when it has been gained based on "years of" experience.

Fifth Manipulation Law:

Who knows about the power of feelings, will look at many things in life differently!

The manipulation with our feelings, to which we are constantly exposed, has its causes in many emotional value concepts, to which we are subject:

1. honor

2. loyalty

3. courage

4. justice

5. obedience

6. order

7. discipline

8. honesty

9. masculinity

Much of our thinking and acting takes place in a world of emotions on which we are dependent. It is predominantly a make-believe world in which the discrepancy between rational knowledge is always at odds with our emotional dependence.

Whoever addresses the feelings of his opponent once has won more than by hundreds of well-founded and factual arguments.

Ways to use the emotional dependence of others to one's advantage:

1. the played modesty:

- The opponent will underestimate us and overestimate himself.

- He will declare out of sheer politeness and gratitude for the flattery that he is actually not that good, freely revealing some of his weaknesses.

- He will, out of sheer politeness, start assuring us that we are much more capable than we think. In doing so, he reveals to us some weaknesses that he believes we possess.

2. the flight to the front:

- We take advantage of the fact that people are not judged by their real abilities, but by how good they are at posing as authority

- We feign a higher authority than we actually possess (example Captain of Köpenick)

- We talk to our opponent only about topics he knows absolutely nothing about and avoid topics he does know something about.

Sixth Law of Manipulation:

Fear is an important factor in the manipulative game

The usefulness of fear as a mechanism for the purpose of survival decreases as man's intelligence increases. He no longer needs fear for his protection, but it still influences his behavior just as it does in creatures without reason.

Types of fear:

1. the fear of losing what has been acquired again

2. the fear of the uncertain

3. the fear of reality

Exploiting the fear of others to gain advantage in the manipulative game:

1.Step: assessing the opponent and finding out his weak points.

2.Step: credibly pointing out a danger that could threaten him without knowing a solution.

3.Step: Offering a solution that lulls him into a sense of security and gives us an advantage.

Seventh Manipulation Law:

Those who do not decide for themselves risk that others will do it for them.

Decision-making processes depend on:

- the general attitude of the person making the decision

- his knowledge about the subject of the decision

- on the persons who influence his decision directly or indirectly

Two aspects of decisions:

1. personal, individual desires

2. the need to adapt to the environment and to be considerate of others. In short, not to be disagreeable.

Decision types:

- He knows exactly what he wants and is difficult to influence. This makes him difficult to manipulate.

- He does not really know what he wants. Easily influenced and manipulated. Every little reinforcement in one direction will influence his decision. Sometimes you just have to find the right moment to demand the decision.

Eighth Law of Manipulation:

Often you achieve more without talking much than with many words.

Much more important than saying a lot is saying or doing the right thing at the right moment.

Small gestures are sometimes more important than long speeches

Preparations:

- Before we begin a conversation, we need to have established the goal of our maneuver.

- If we ourselves are convinced of what we want to say, because we have thought it through thoroughly beforehand, we will be able to state it impressively without rambling on for a long time.

- The attention of the opponent is not unlimited. Therefore, we must take advantage of the moment when he is ready to receive our message in a concentrated way.

- The opponent's attention and positive attitude are especially high when he is the center of the conversation. That is, when we are talking about him or have encouraged him to talk about himself.

Conducting a manipulative conversation:

At the beginning of a conversation, the focus should be on the opponent. This can be done by highlighting one of his or her assets.

The resulting positive atmosphere is further developed. It is important that the opponent remains the center of attention and that the suspicion of "what does he want from me" is eliminated. A question that particularly interests the opponent is always effective.

From point 2, there are further clues for the conversation

The opponent must be skillfully brought to represent our own cause, we ourselves are neutral and steer him by purposeful questions (Yes, but ..disadvantage) in our direction

If the opponent is still negative, we bring his advantages of the matter into the conversation, as well as some unimportant disadvantages. (We remain neutral)

If the opponent is still negative, we stop the conversation and tell him that he can reconsider the matter.

After analyzing the conversation, we continue with point 1, because this attempt was certainly not yet the defeat.

And whoever thinks about these seemingly clumsy manipulation rules and compares what is delivered in the media and in politics, will find a lot here.

Oh yes, and the more we allow ourselves to be remote-controlled from the outside, the less freedom will we have.

What are emotional technicians?
Emotional technicians are people who, in order to achieve the desired goals, describe situations in such a way that such strong emotions are triggered in the target persons who receive this information that any demand for the information content and the truth of the information is nipped in the bud and a broad mass pursues the desired goal with all fervor.

According to former Tagesschau editor Volker Bräutigam, the Pentagon alone employs 29,000 people whose job it is to create stories to influence people worldwide.

One example that made high waves was the picture of a drowned little boy who was fleeing to Germany with his father. And everyone cried out that the refugees must be helped so that such a thing does not happen. In the interview, which circulated shortly afterwards on the Internet, the boy's father said quite openly that he had wanted to go to Germany so that he could get new teeth made there free of charge. And for exactly this reason he risked and lost the life of his son, because of new teeth.  There is no trace of other reasons for fleeing.

But the image of the drowned child has made many people react in the same way as it is wanted.

Another story just came to my mind, it concerns Germany's most widely read newspaper, which hardly anyone reads when asked, the Bild-Zeitung.

There was a picture of a fighter plane on fire with the headline: "Putin attacks Turkey". Great, that burns itself immediately into the thoughts of humans, the bad Putin once again. 

What had really happened? Turkey shot down a Russian plane that was flying missions in Syria. In accordance with international law, by the way, because Syria asked Russia for help. All other forces deployed there, whether U.S., U.K., France, and even Germany are in violation of international law, but that's another issue again.

Yes, the Russian plane violated Turkish airspace over a spit of land, and it was radioed several times, according to Turkish sources, for several minutes, and when the Russian pilot didn't respond, they shot it down.

But if you look at it carefully, the distance flown over was so short that the Russian plane's stay in Turkish airspace could have lasted a maximum of 7 seconds even at minimum airspeed. And such airspace violations occur between all countries again and again without anything happening.

What then could have been the reason for the shooting down? I can only speculate. The son-in-law of the Turkish President Erdogan, one Berat Albayrak, has probably been in a leading position in the company Powertrans. This company Powertrans is by law the only company in Turkey that is allowed to import as well as export oil. And after IS took some oil fields under its control, it also did business with Turkey and transported oil to Turkey by convoys of trucks. These transports were attacked by the Russian air force, of course, because Russia was fighting against IS. And now you only need to count one and one together and you know the reason.

And it is understandable that Putin has accused the Turkish government, isn't it?

Would you like another example?

On April 7, 2018, an attack was flown by the Syrian Air Force on the rebel stronghold of Duma in Eastern Ghouta, and pictures on the net show children allegedly suffering the consequences of a poison gas attack. As a result of this poison gas attack, the U.S., France, and Britain launched a missile attack against Syria in retaliation for the international outlawing of chemical weapons and to destroy chemical weapons factories. This was done before any real evidence was available as to whether chemical weapons had been used at all, which had been denied by both Syria and Russia.

In retrospect, it turned out that there probably had been no poison gas attack and that the pictures were staged.

The background to all these actions is simply that those who want to manipulate are best at appealing to people's emotions. And with those, which do not recognize these methods, then the criticism ability lowers.

In some cases, even large advertising agencies are commissioned to create campaigns for anything that benefits the system. Whether it is disagreeable politicians, such as Gaddafi or Putin, or diseases such as cancer and AIDS, if a generally valid opinion is to prevail among the citizens, then the advertising drum is beaten for it.

bannere