The climate hype, taken in a different way


When we talk about the climate issue, a young woman, Greta Thunberg, is definitely at the centre of the discussions. On the one hand, it is celebrated because the youth finally wants to change something, on the other hand it is totally hostile because it has let itself be stretched in front of a cart as a driving horse, the direction of which many consider to be wrong.

Who or what is Greta Thunberg? On the one hand, she is a highly motivated young woman who, because of her coinage, represents "her" cause with all her energy. On the other hand, at the age of 16, she is still a child, in the midst of the process of growing up. She has also been diagnosed with Asberger syndrome, which is manifested by sensory and neurological disorders in the field of communication, but also often promotes island talent. Just think of the absolutely brilliant Vera Birkenbihl.

Can we remember how we were when we were 16? We, too, thought we knew everything, wanted to change the world, were full of energy. By now we know that at this age only the mind is trained, this begins with the beginning of puberty, before children only absorb all information as in hypnosis. And then we are welcome to ask what kind of system our children are being shaped into. You get to know a lot of information, that's probably true. But they only learn this information, so they learn what to think and not how to think. What they should not learn under any circumstances is to question things.

When I look back in this way, I remember my topic, on which I had focused on the Abi examination in the field of history. It was about the development to the Third Reich, i.e. about the rise and the grab of the makers by Hitler and thus the NSDAP. How naive i was at that time to painstakingly chew what I had been taught in history lessons. With my knowledge today, I could give tens of times as much information about me, if I had already presented this knowledge at that time, a stoning would probably have been the least evil I could have expected.

Or take physics to stick to the subject of climate. The greenhouse effect has been taught and presented as irrefutable knowledge since time immemorial, although it was refuted by Professor Robert W. Wood in 1909. We are told that the warming within the greenhouse is caused by the fact that the interior of the greenhouse is heated by invading solar radiation, and that this radiation is then radiated again at a different frequency and then returned from the glass walls of the greenhouse. reflected into the interior. This then leads to further warming. Sounds logical, but it's wrong.

The laws of thermodynamics state that heat can be transmitted either by radiation, by direct contact and by convection. This can be noticed with the radiation itself with each ray of the sun, and also with the touch, because if I get on a hot stove top, then we realize quite quickly that heat is transmitted here. We see the convection on our radiators, because the air circulates past them and heats up, making the air in the room warmer. This Professor Wood has now carried out experiments with a wide variety of materials, proving that warming in the greenhouse is only caused by the heat irradiated not escape. The greenhouse effect thus occurs only in a closed system, into which radiation can occur, but no heat can escape through the air. In the meantime, a detailed description of his experiments can also be found on the Internet, so that everyone can understand them for themselves.

But in addition to the information that is conveyed, there is another effect that is infused into the children, and this is the fear. Whereas in the 1960s it was still the nonsensical atomic bomb protection measure, today it is the exercises concerning amok runners. Always true to the motto: "Get in a corner and wait helplessly for your death". Fear and helplessness are presented as an indispensable part of life. So this is the spiritual background in which young people grow up.

So who is Greta? An infinite soul, misguided and thus the tool of a campaign that does not aim to save humanity from destruction.

Now smart businessmen like Mr. Rentzhog come up with the idea of marketing this climate thing very big and making Greta a kind of superstar of the climate. As a result, there is a huge division through the population. On the one hand, those who like it all and on the other hand those who are a bad game and are against it.

In any case, we can state that a 16-year-old should not be the one who should get away with our frustration caused by the situation. To pillory a child, and on the one hand, it is still very pathetic.

But how do we deal with the situation? When you criticize this campaign, you are vilified as a right-wing conspiracy theorist, and as soon as you come up with real arguments, the only question that comes from the people infected by the campaign is: "What are we supposed to do, just like that. next?".

No, of course not just on. Act, but right.

I am thinking of a quotation from the Bible:

"By their fruits you shall know them." Matthew 7:20.

What do we want to sell and, above all, what conclusions do we draw here?

We are told that we have climate change caused by man and CO2 as a greenhouse gas is the greatest evil.
Last but not least, we have ever-increasing pollution.

One can confidently observe that Greta, and with her the entire generation, was shaped in a climate of furch and fear, feelings that prevent any truly logical thinking and make those affected vulnerable to anything that promises them help.

Yes, we have seen climate change, seriously within the changing seasons, but also in the long term. But this is quite normal and man, despite all efforts, cannot do anything about it or do anything about it. Warmer times have always alternated with colder times. I am thinking only of the 1970s, when the next ice age was predicted, it was not so long ago.

Back in 1958, NASA published a report in which changes in weather conditions due to changes in solar orbit are completely natural and normal, but they have completely withdrawn from public discussion. As recently as 2000, they published reports related to the Milankowitch theory, which clearly states that the weather changes due to external factors that have absolutely nothing to do with what people do on this planet. But this information is also hidden in the mainstream.

Instead, the evil CO2 must be maintained.

To illustrate, CO2 is only 0.038 percent in the air, and nature produces 96 percent of that.
Humans therefore cause 4% of this, which makes an effective influence of 0.00152%.

CO2 is heavier than air, so always below, and not in an ozone layer. And CO2 is needed by the plants as breathing air, which absorbs carbon and release oxygen for it. Which causes the CO2 to be re-divided into its components carbon and oxygen.

And the more CO2 in the air, the better the plants grow, which is why the content is artificially increased in some of the greenhouses so that the plants grow better.

Yes, but ... I hear right away.

Yet 97% of all scientists agree that CO2 is the cause of all the world's ills, right?

Well, a questionnaire with only two questions was sent to 1700 scientists, most of them did not evaluate the second question at all. And of these, about 70 were selected and declared experts. That's not how you make statistics.

The fact that scientists who are now taking really serious action against this hype are not really being reported.

But let us take a look at what measures are to be taken to prevent the impending end of the world in a few years' time.

The most important thing is taxes, a lot of taxes. On CO2. After all, which politician doesn't like being able to tax the breathing air?

Then there is electromobility. The cars rush silently past us without any emissions, if that is not climate-friendly, what is it then?

But the electricity comes from power plants, mainly from coal-fired power plants and a few foreign nuclear reactors, and the share of climate-neutral energy we generate is negligible. It should be clear that combustion cannot be filtered in these power plants in the same way as combustion engines do. The fact that we are cutting down huge forests so that we can get to coal is also very environmentally friendly. Well, and first of all, the effort that is being put into winning lithium in Chile. Whole areas are being dried up, but that is a long way off. And the few children who come to our lives in Congo while digging for cobalt with their bare hands are not worth talking about, arethey? It's both far away. And the importance of every electric car carrying the weight of 4-7 adults in the form of batteries is not so important. And that the batteries will be the worst hazardous waste in a few years, that is something that can still be taken care of when the time comes.

Do you notice what?

On the one hand, this is a question of depriving citizens of even more money, and on the other hand, they are being forced into ever-increasing consumption.

The ubiquitous magic word is "economic growth." So that it continues.

But that's exactly how it goes down the creek. Unstoppable.

Economic growth is built on consumers, people who can be swept up in ever-faster succession.

And that's where every single one is in demand. Just buy what you really need and insist that you get durable products. What is the use of a product that consumes less energy but requires as much energy in production as the old product has been in many years?

Yes, but if we consume less, will jobs also fall?

That is true, and that is a good thing.

If we look at it carefully, we will pay between 70 and 80% of our earnings in taxes and social security contributions to the state. If these levies were lower, we would need to work much less at the same standard of living.

Technology is advancing, and many jobs are now being done by machines. But instead of using it that everyone has to work less, production and consumption is far beyond normal demand. And what cannot be sold quickly is destroyed rather than sold cheaper. Brand new goods for the ton.

A sick world, driven by a few large corporations and even fewer high earners.

We all have it in our hands and can change it.

Become conscious and join in.